Unfortunately, I must disagree with your stated point that Cap and Trade is a system that will not work and is merely a distraction. Your proposed solutions (Solid Caps, Strong Laws, Citizen Action, and Carbon Fees) should fit well with a properly functioning carbon market, and are not an independent alternative.

I agree that bogus credits should not be given out, but that should be an amendment to the regulation of a carbon market, not a condemnation of the whole market. Strong Laws and Carbon Fees will impose higher costs on companies, making them grudgingly comply, but lobby heavily against continuation of these policies. A properly functioning cap and trade market, however, creates an opportunity for additional income (based on clean investment and intellectual capital development) that will get many companies EXCITED about reducing emissions rather than fighting against the law. Because they are excited and see a chance for income, they will invest even MORE in efficiency if this type of policy passes, which meets your goal of reducing pollution and growing closer to a sustainable situation. I have worked on many projects and there is a great opportunity across the board for companies to be climate partners instead of adversaries. This includes not only large factories, but churches, restaurants, local manufacturers, and all players in the energy economy. Because companies will thrive in this type of market-based solution, people will be employed, which should keep Citizen Action on your side. It’s hard to keep the citizenry motivated for a better life if they are not working and cannot afford to do positive things with the people they love who are enriching their life.